Top U.S. military lawyers from the Judge Advocate General's Corps unleashed a unprecedented public statement on November 30, 2025, branding President Donald Trump's Caribbean airstrikes on alleged drug boats as "clear war crimes" and "extrajudicial executions," demanding immediate congressional probes and potential court-martials. The 12-page missive, signed by 47 retired JAG officers including former Joint Chiefs counsel, slams the strikes—killing over 20 Venezuelans and Colombians since September—as violations of the Geneva Conventions and U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice, lacking imminent threat or congressional authorization.
.jpg)
The lawyers excoriate Trump's "unlawful combatants" label for fishermen and smugglers, echoing Bush-era overreach but without al-Qaeda's attack precedent, calling it a "systematic attack on civilians" prosecutable as crimes against humanity at the ICC. Strikes expanded to Pacific vessels tied to Tren de Aragua, with Trump boasting 11 kills on Truth Social, but UN experts and ex-ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo affirm premeditated murder outside armed conflict. Colombian President Petro confirmed civilian fishermen deaths, fueling bipartisan fury as Sen. Tim Kaine vows war powers resolutions.[5][7][10][2]
White House chaos ensues: Trump's "war on cartels" defense crumbles under JAG fire, with Rubio's narco-terrorist claims unproven amid asset freezes and shutdown woes. Pentagon leaks reveal pilots refusing orders, fearing prosecution, as #TrumpWarCrimes trends with 4M posts roasting the commander-in-chief.[4][2]
GOP leaders distance amid midterms peril, while Dems eye impeachment articles. Trump's retaliation: sanctions threats on critics, but JAGs stand firm—"oath to Constitution over commander".[2]
In summary, elite military lawyers' explosive war crimes statement torches Trump's drug war strikes, exposing illegal killings and eroding his authority. This JAG mutiny signals existential peril for the presidency
Post a Comment